0000
Written
1997
Addressed to
2010
Status
Expired

Time: The year is 2010. There are significant technical advances, but the clothes and habits of ordinary people in the 'Donor' World are no different to those of Third World citizens today.

Manjula Padmanabhan

Harvest, Kali for Women, 1997. Winner of 1997 Onassis Award.

Annotation

By 2010, Mumbai's reality eerily mirrored Padmanabhan's dystopia. India's organ trafficking crisis was extensively documented, with impoverished donors selling kidneys to wealthy recipients — both domestic and international. Smartphone adoption was exploding, video calling had become commonplace, yet the rich-poor divide remained exactly as depicted. The play's core premise — that globalization would create a world where the poor literally sell their bodies to the rich, mediated by technology — proved disturbingly accurate.

#society#health-medicine#technology

Related Entries

1980
expires0000

Why did I pick on the next nine years instead of the next 900 for finding a solution to the population crisis? One answer is that the world is rapidly running out of food. And famine, of course, could be one way to reach a death rate solution to the population problem. In fact, the battle to feed humanity is already lost, in the sense that we will not be able to prevent large famines in the next decade or so.

Dr Paul R. EhrlichCulture & Society
1981
expires0000

In twenty years, the USSR will be producing almost twice as much industrial output as is now produced in the entire non socialist world.

The 22nd Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet UnionCulture & Society
1888
expires0000

At present weapons are being changed every ten years, and even more frequently. In another fifteen years or so, people will use for shooting not rifles but some kind of lightning, some sort of a machine emitting a holocaustal electrical stream. Tell me: what can we invent in this line so as to surprise our neighbors? What if in fifteen years every great power will have secretly stored away one such surprise for any kind of eventuality? Alas, we are merely capable of imitating and purchasing ammunition from others, and—at best—of repairing it at home. To invent such machines we should have to have our own independent, and not purchased, science, not an imported but a free one—one that has taken root in our soil. As yet we do not possess such a science, nor do we even have a purchased one.

Fyodor Mikhailovich DostoevskyCulture & Society